Managing Editor of the Insight newspaper, Kwesi Pratt Jnr., has opposed the Supreme Court verdict saying a "Deputy Speaker is entitled to be counted as a Member of Parliament for quorum" and can "vote and take part in the decision of Parliament".
The Supreme Court, by a seven member panel, made this decision unanimously on Wednesday, March 9, 2022.
But to the seasoned Journalist, the verdict is an erosion of the Speaker's neutrality in presiding over parliamentary proceedings.
He argued that as soon as the Deputy Speaker sits in the Speaker's seat, he assumes the Speaker's role, so wondered why they should have a right to vote.
"Deputy Speakers are Deputy Speakers. Deputy Speakers are not Speakers. That's a fact but when Deputy Speakers move and sit in that chair with the gavel, they exercise the powers of Speakers. They do not exercise the powers of Speakers because they have the same salary with the Speaker. They exercise the powers of Speaker clearly because in that position they are performing functions of the Speaker and in that position as they perform the functions of Speaker, they are expected to rise above the partisanship in the House."
"How do they rise above the partisanship in the House when they are voting and debating and so on? . . . if the drafters of the constitution intended the position of Speaker to be a neutral arbiter, how can those act in stead of the Speaker not be expected to act as neutral arbiters?'', he asked.
"All of us, normal right-thinking people, do we expect persons presiding over parliamentary affairs to be neutral or we don't? Do we expect a certain level of neutrality or we don't? Now, if we expect a certain level of neutrality and independence for persons presiding over parliamentary affairs, how do you guarantee that neutrality?
''If the person presiding over the affairs in Parliament is involved in the debate and can cast a vote in favor of a side and so on, how then can you establish the Speaker's impartiality and neutrality?", he further queried.
To Mr. Pratt, the purpose of the verdict is just to allow the "so-called majority to carry the day even as we have 137/137. That's the effect. That is the effect; no other effect!"
Source: Ameyaw Adu Gyamfi/Peacefmonline.com/Ghana
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority. |
When did the SPEAKER EVER SAY THAT HE IS NEUTRAL? Is it Mr. Pratts creation of political neutrality or is confused in drawing the lines between neutrality and impartiality. The Peace FM production team direct him to this link. https://www.myjoyonline.com/i-cant-be-neutral-but-will-be-impartial-as-a-speaker-bagbin/#:~:text=The%20Speaker%20of%20Parliament%2C%20Alban%20Sumana%20Bagbin%2C%20says,or%20against%20the%20right%2C%20I%20will%20see%20it.%E2%80%9D
Kwesi you are too old to be making such submissions… it’s about time you retire.
Is the Speaker of parliament suppose to be part of the debate on the floor, or is to ensure that the majority decision is confirmed? How does the Speaker's stand affect a decision that he was not directly part of taking? Mr. Pratt should please educate us properly on the Speaker's role in parliament.
Is the electoral commissioner neutral? Does she vote? Mr. Pratt, Adabraka!
Mr Pratt , you are absolutely wrong in your submissions. The deputy speaker acting in the stead of the Speaker cannot be robbed off being an elected MP representing a particular constituency. This is basic fundamentals. What is he first, a speaker or an MP?. He is in the house as an MP first and foremost. Acting for the speaker does not mean he abdicates his position as an MP. Please wrap your uninformed legal mind around the sound judgement from the judges of the supreme court. The absolute verdict of all the 7 judges without dissent should speak loud enough to you. Yes they are not divine but they know better than you so please stop the uninformed ranting.
Are the deputy speakers not coming from a political party and at the same time representing their constituents? Which constituents is the speaker representing in parliament? Is the deputy speaker going home with his full salary as the speaker? The deputy speaker doesn’t enjoy the same benefits like that of the speaker at the same time the two positions are different. Kwasi prat always support wrong things and always incites the public against the government.