The Chamber of Petroleum Consumers-Ghana(COPEC-GH) has called for an immediate suspension of government’s Energy Sector Bond.
According to COPEC-GH, the move will only prolong the cost burden on consumers by adding almost $500 million extra to the existing debt portfolios.
COPEC in a statement released Monday argued that in spite of the need to pay off the debts and clean the books of these power companies, the current mix will only serve a temporal purpose if the pertinent issues are not immediately addressed instead of going for further debts onto the existing debt profiles.
Background
The auction of the GH¢6 billion cedi-denominated energy sector bond began last Tuesday as the government sought funds to refinance the huge energy sector debt which has contributed to the unprecedented high levels of non-performing loans (NPLs) on the books of the banks.
Local and offshore investors, made up of local pension fund managers, were briefed on the nature and structure of the bond, which has been described as a better alternative to government papers (Treasury bills) on the market because of its size and risk profile.
The bond, which was issued in two tranches of GH¢2.4 billion and GH¢3.6 billion, had a seven-year and a 10-year tenure, respectively.
The Ghana cedi-denominated bond is listed and traded on the Fixed Income Market of the Ghana Stock Exchange (GSE) under conditions yet to be announced.
E.S.L.A. Plc (unrated), an independent special purpose company established and sponsored by Ghana, acting through the Ministry of Finance, appointed Standard Chartered Bank Ghana Limited and Fidelity Bank Ghana Limited to arrange a series of fixed-income investor meetings prior to the roadshow. Co-managers of the mandate are Temple Investments and GCB Bank
Read full statement by COPEC-GH
CHAMBER OF PETROLEUM CONSUMERS-GHANA
HALT AND REVIEW THE GHC10BILLION ENERGY BOND
30/10/17
BACKGROUND
The Government of Ghana in December 2015, introduced the Energy Sector Levies Bill to parliament with the aim of raking in some additional revenues downstream from petroleum consumers, notable among these new taxes was the introduction of the Energy Debt Recovery Levy whose main purpose was to generate some funds from consumers to be able to pay for the crippling but avoidable debts in the energy and power sectors.
This Energy Sector debt estimated at around $1.6billion at the time, was expected to be retired in a maximum 5 years after which it will be scrapped and taken off the petroleum consumer.
This bill was passed into law and came into effect on January 2nd, 2016, pump prices went up by between 25-30% much to the chagrin of petroleum consumers, but as with all taxes, the excuse was that the government was reeling under huge debts following from the non existent petroleum subsidies programme over the years as well as debts accumulated in the power sector and thus had to raise these monies from the innocent public anyhow to pay. Fuel prices went up.
2017 ENERGY BOND
The Government, through the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning and The Ministry of Energy is showcasing a bond which has till date been under-suscribed due to the uncertainties surrounding it with Fidelity Bank and Standard Chartered Bank serving as the lead banks.
The aim being, to raise a Ghc10billion bond to pay off the energy sector debts now estimated at around $2.5billion.
There is clearly a need to pay off the debts and clean the books of these power companies but the current mix will only serve a temporal purpose if the pertinent issues are not immediately addressed instead of going for further debts onto the existing debt profiles.
The Energy Sector Levies Act (ESLA) increased and introduced other taxes such as the new 41p/litre Energy Debt Recovery Levy fund to be used to pay for the then Energy Debt at $1.6billion
The cumulative effect of the ESLA saw a jump in some existing taxes and an eventual increase in pump prices by between 25-30% onto the petroleum price build up, very notable amongst these new taxes was the 41p/litre Energy Debt Recovery Levy.
This energy sector debt has been variously reported differently from the start of 2016 as it was estimated at around $1.6billion and was expected to be retired in a 5 year period starting from January 2016, using the proceeds from the ESLA.
At the current National daily petroleum consumption of about 10.2million litres/daily. This particular energy debt recovery levy alone at 41p/litre is known to yield over Ghc4Million daily to go into paying for the Energy Sector debt which is originally expected to be retired in the next 4 years and effectively taken off the price build up to reduce the hardship on the common man but seems to become a mirage following the government’s new decision to now float a 10 year bond at a coupon rate of almost 19%.
IMPACT ON FUEL PRICES
The Government’s own promise to scale down on the nuisance taxes though partly fulfilled has so far yielded only a cumulative 2.6% reduction in pump prices from the 2017 asempa budget, although fuel prices has also gone up by over 13% since January to date.
IMPLICATIONS OF THE BOND ON GOVERNMENT’S OWN PROMISE OF REDUCING NUISANCE TAXES
The new bond effectively rules out any possibility whatsoever for the government to ever scale down on these taxes anytime in the foreseeable even in the event of shocks on the international markets as happened in recent times from the hurricanes whose effects Ghanaians are still paying for.
Fuel prices continue to remain very high even though there has been streinous attempts by some oil marketing companies to reduce their margins and pump prices and one expect officials at the Energy Ministry to attempt using much better options at managing the issues than just lazily issuing bonds to add further costs to the already suffering consumer.
TENOR OF PAYMENT.
Consumers of petroleum products after almost 2 years of paying for Energy Sector Debts are simply being asked to brace up to now permanently pay for Energy Sector Debts as part of their daily fuel consumption with the introduction of this 10 year bond.
BACKGROUND TO ENERGY DEBTS
Some of the factors known to have contributed to the crippling Energy Sector debts are
a) Subsidies on petroleum products
b) Subsidies on power
c) Obsolete equipments leading to transmission losses.
d) Weak collections as well as Non collection and non payment of electricity bills due.
e) Illegal connections
f) Undertaking of very expensive agreements by electricity company of Ghana often resulting in huge financial challenges.
All the above factors that culminated in the growing debts in the energy sector continue to remain as they were with the exception of the introduction of price liberalisation in the petroleum downstream, that has now completely dealt with the issue of petroleum subsidies even though the debts owed the Bulk Distribution Companies still remains unpaid.
Information in the power sector as of today points to new losses of over Ghc70million for this year alone and that the same practices that brought the debts continue to be at play but sadly the petroleum consumer is asked to pay for these avoidable losses which very little has been done about to curtail other than collecting of monies.
CONCLUSIONS
1) An immediate halting, revision or discontinuation of this killer Energy Bond as it will only prolong the cost burden on the innocent consumer by adding almost $500million extra to the existing debt portfolios.
2) An immediate audit of all the power agencies under the Energy Ministry especially the electricity Company of Ghana to ensure all unrealistic and unsustainable practices leading to these losses be corrected to arrest the debts.
3) Quarterly publication of realizations from the Energy debt levy and how it has been applied or disbursed
4) Strict application of the proceeds of the ESLA to ensure that the agreed payment schedules are not missed.
5) A complete plan be put in place to ensure all bulk consumers of power especially the government and private industries that use power do not shirk their responsibilty in paying for power, in this regard, there is the need to overhaul the factors leading to the Energy Sector Debts with immediate effect.
Failure to do the needful but resorting to bond issuance as the panacea for the Energy Sector Debts will only lead to filling a leaking basket which will never realise the needed outcome.
<<Print>>