A ranking member on Parliament’s Finance Committee, Cassiel Ato Forson, remains unrelenting in his opposition to the medical drone agreement, calling it a misplaced priority a day after it was approved by a majority decision in Parliament.
He says in a statement released on Tuesday that there are misleading claims by persons who appear ill-informed about the project that he describes as a scheme of Vice President, Dr. Mahamadu Bawumia.
”The pronouncements of these [ill-informed] officials have created more confusion...A case in point is the public submission by the Director-General of the Ghana Health Service, Dr [Anthony] Nsiah Asare. Dr Asare has been unable to answer critical questions relating to this transaction leaving many issues outstanding,” he said.
He added: “Dr Nsiah-Asare refused to comment on the discount of $11,000 when he made his $88,000 argument. Even if the $88000 cost is true for 100% operating capacity, why is it that it is not pro-rated so that if Zipline operates at only 5% capacity which is the most likely then Ghana pays only 5% x $88000 = $4,400 instead of the $10,000 in the agreement.
“The $10,000 for only 5% operating capacity implies that Ghana is being charged the equivalent of $200000 ($10000/0.05) per month per distribution centre. Despite amending page three of the agreement to make the service charge $ 88,000 per month per distribution centre, it should have been pro-rated.”
Approved
Parliament by a majority decision approved the agreement to allow the use of drones to distribute essential drugs and blood to health facilities across the country.
In a head count Tuesday, 102 legislators voted for the controversial policy, with 58 dissenting.
The dissenting votes came from the Minority National Democratic Congress (NDC) MPs.
The parliamentary approval means USA-based Zipline International Inc, in partnership with the Ghana Health Service, will next year begin to use the unmanned aircraft systems to deliver essential health care products to hospitals and other health facilities in the country.
The system will also be employed to deliver other items such as urgent letters, examination papers and election materials such as ballot papers, according to government communication on the deal.
Read the Mr Forson’s release below.
Statement on inflated and misplaced Zipline drone contract
Subsequent to the Minority in Parliament’s discovery of evidence of inflation in the contract between the Government of Ghana and Zipline for the operation of drone delivery services in the country, I have noted a number of misleading claims by persons who appear ill-informed about the subject. It is widely known that this inflated contract is the baby and handiwork of the Vice President, Dr. Mahamadu Bawumia.
Yet he has failed to own up and explain the many inflated cost items inherent in the contract.
Instead, he appears to be seeking refuge behind Civil and Public servants who have demonstrated little knowledge about the project through their public statements.
The pronouncements of these officials have created more confusion than. A case in point is the public submission by the Director-General of the Ghana Health Service, Dr Nsiah Asare. Dr Asare has been unable to answer critical questions relating to this transaction leaving many issues outstanding. I wish to draw attention to the fact that:
1. Up to date, Dr. Nsiah Asare has not been able to tell Ghanaians what the cost of a drone per distribution centre is. Neither has he disputed the $1m cost per distribution Centre figure I put out.
2. Import duty is 20% on CIF, hence the basis of my cost computation $100,0000/0.2 =$500,0000/4 = $125,0000
3. Dr Nsiah Asare refused to comment on the discount of $11,000 when he made his $88,000 argument. Even if the $88000 cost is true for 100% operating capacity, why is it that it is not pro-rated so that if Zipline operates at only 5% capacity which is the most likely then Ghana pays only 5% x $88000 =$4,400 instead of the $10,000 in the agreement.
The $10,000 for only 5% operating capacity implies that Ghana is being charged the equivalent of $200000 ($10000/0.05) per month per distribution centre. Despite amending page three of the agreement to make the service charge $ 88,000 per month per distribution centre, it should have been pro-rated.
4. Dr Nsiah Asare also stated in his emotional argument that the money is not coming from the state, but rather from GNPC and some Petroleum and Mining companies. Let me make it very clear to all that GNPC is wholly owned by the state hence the $1m promised per year is public funds. Also, Mining and Petroleum companies pay tax at 35% hence every $100,000 donated by such companies in the form of CSR implies that the state is contributing $35000 (tax shield) since CSR is tax deductible.
5. I sincerely believe that if Ghana buys the drones and the ancillary equipment’s from Zipline and Zipline agrees to train staff of the GHS to operate it for a period of just two months, the state will not spend more than $6m on all the four distribution centres over the four year period.
6. The 20% penalty for delayed payment in the agreement implies that Zipline’s cost of capital is 20% which is quite outrageous and unimaginable because the last Eurobond that Ghana issued was at only 7.62% (10yr bond). This means that Ghana’s cost of capital on a dollar project should never exceed 7.62% which strengthens the argument for outright purchase.
7. Dr. Nsiah Asare says the Suhum sight is ready hence GNPC should just give us the first $1m so that Ghana can buy the equipment from Zipline to kick-start the project.
8. Per the 72 rule in finance, Zipline will double their investment in 3.6yrs (72/20) if Dr.Nsiah Asare’s $12m cost for the project is true then this confirms my assertion that Ghana need not spend more than $6m for the entire project if Ghana buys the equipment from Zipline. It quite clear from the above, that this Zipline deal is an extremely bad one for the country and it unfortunate that the Vice President would champion it with the zeal that he has deployed.
I believe that posterity will soon vindicate this position.
Cassiel Ato Forson, Ranking Member, Finance Committee of Parliament
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority. |
THIS ATO FORSON GUY IS A LI AR AND HAS NO CREDIBILITY. HE DOES NOT READ AGREEMENTS BEFORE COMMENTING ON THEM AND WHEN HE EVEN ATTEMPT READING, HE LACKS THE RIGHT UNDERSTANDING DUE TO HIS PREJUDICED MIND. NO GHANAIAN WORTH HIS CALL BELIEVES THIS GUY AND HIS LO OTING GANG. MTCHEWWW
BAAM ANOTNHER DWANFUNU SYNDROME BECAUSE THEIR HEAD IS THE MOST INCOMPETENT -ONE CANDIDATE SO WHAT ELSE DO YOU EXPECT FROM ODWAN BA MEEEEE, INEPT NDC MP'S IN GHANA PARLIAMENT EVEN EFF IN SOUTH AFRICAN IS MORE VIBRANT AND COMPETENT THAN THIS NDC MP'S, HOW THIS KIND OF MP WAS A FMR FINANCE MINISTER NO WONDER IMF CRIPPLED GHANA DEVELOPMENT.
I saw him doing some voodoo calculations on TV and I asked myself, this one too be MP and was once a deputy minister. God, have mercy on Ghana
Ato Forson, why can't you argue your case out clearly in parliament where you come face-to-face with your co-equals, but you prefer to use public opinion to achieve your objectives> I can see that when you lose in parliament, whatever you say outside becomes irrelevant when you lose the vote. My humble advice to you is that, when new things come up, take your time to seek the necessary information, digest it, analyse it before you come out. Very soon people will not trust you to listen to you again. Even if you bring out a good point its import will be lost.
CD=CHOBO DRONE NO AMBULANCE NO MONEY TO BUY GENERATORS TO OPERATIONAL LEGON ULTRA MODERN HOSPITAL BUT MONEY WAS RAISED FOR CHOBO DRONES(CD). GOD SAVE GHANA
this one and bus branding which one is more important? greedy bastards in opposition
My friend, you could have made all your arguments in Parliament where you have complete immunity any insults and attacks outside Parliament would not be tolerated. YOUR ARE AN EXPERT IN REPORTING, I SUGGEST YOU REPORT TO THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. A failure of a kind always churning out wrong information. Be it known to you that your are deemed to be the most incredible parliamentarian.