An Accra High Court (Commercial Division) has dismissed a suit filed by Lithur Brew and Company demanding the payment of GH₵2,005,320 being legal fees owed by the Ghana Cocoa Board (COCOBOD), for being incompetent.
The law firm, Lithur Brew & Co, in August 2017, filed a writ of summons against the COCOBOD, praying the court to recover the said money and interests accrued at the prevailing commercial bank’s lending rate from February 20, 2017.
The plaintiff, represented by Tony Lithur – a prominent NDC lawyer and counsel for former President John Dramani Mahama in the 2012 election petition hearing – also requested the court to order for costs and other things as the court may deem fit.
The Ghana Cocoa Board, represented by George Laing, in its affidavit in opposition, prayed the court to “strike out the writ of summons and statement of claim against the defendant for want of capacity as the writ is incompetent.”
He argued that by the laws of Ghana, it is only a person whose name is entered on the Roll of lawyers, who is competent to maintain an action for the recovery of his or her legal fees, among others.
Mr Laing further argued that the plaintiff never entered on the Roll of lawyers nor licensed to practise in accordance with the law and that “as the present writ of summons and statement of claim stands, same is incompetent and same must be struck out.”
The court, presided over by Justice Samuel K.A. Asiedu, wondered whether a law firm can sue for recovery of unpaid legal fees.
He held that the plaintiff in the matter is described as a company and for that matter is not a natural person, as by law, it is only lawyers who may be licensed to render legal services according to the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct and Etiquette) Rules, 1969, Li 613.
“In the opinion of the court, the word ‘person’ as used in Section 2 of the Legal Profession Act, means a natural person and it does not include artificial person like the plaintiff in this suit.
“According to the Act, it is such natural persons whose names are entered on the Roll of lawyers who may, subject to being licensed, practise law, whether as barristers or solicitors or both, and who are given the power under the Act to sue to recover fees, charges and other disbursements for services which they have rendered to their clients,” the judge ruled.
Justice Asiedu also held that “it follows therefore that a “non-natural” person cannot in the first place render legal services, let alone sue for the recovery of fees and charges and other disbursements.
“In so far as the plaintiff cannot practise law, it follows that the plaintiff cannot sue to recover fees. No one is entitled to sue to recover fees for work it has not done or cannot do.
“In the opinion of the court, the plaintiff, in this suit, has no capacity to institute the instant action against the within-named defendant for the relief endorsed on the writ of summons. The instant action is therefore incompetent and the writ is therefore dismissed,” Justice Asiedu ruled.
Source: Daily Guide
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority. |
Wrong judgment The licence was valid at the time of providing the service and can therefore sue for recovery of fees.
So as lawyer he didn't know this? Your company is not licensed to practise as a lawyer so how the heck could you sew for legal fees? Blinded by greed!
This Lithur man can only win cases when Atuguba is the judge. Let the finance minister give him the BoG vault keys. Non***barred word***.
Ei, won't NDC people have mercy on Ghana? Of what material were they made? Why do they always want to milk Ghana dry like that?
it is only in Ghana that such uncharacteristic characters will be entertained in courts. the lawyer should have being arrested and put in police custody for presenting fake licensed number as a lawyer
They will continue to behave this way and later come and blame npp
What a ***barred word*** judgment using idiotic, animalistic and archaic and corrupt-infested judgment. In any case Tony Lithur can go back to the same court with his name this time round and not his company which has duly registered. Ghanaian judges need modern education especially judges like this one and E.K. Mensah now sitting at the general jurisdiction court 5.
Ei, NDC and judgment debt! 'Won adiaaaaa, enti wosusu se wo benya bi adi bio'!
Oyiwa. Everyone knew all along that this Tony Lithur fellow is a master crook and thrives on bribing his way out of tight situations. Now that he has met his real masters, he should disrobe himself.
Tony is a c r o o k full stop.