Former Attorney General Marietta Brew Appiah-Oppong has told journalists in Accra that the petitioner in the ongoing election petition hearing and the lawyers have nothing to do but accept the ruling of the Supreme Court to the effect that witnesses cannot be compelled to mount the witness box to testify in the case.
“The ruling is the decision of the Supreme Court of Ghana. We have nothing to do but to accept it. We disagree with the decision and so we are going to file an application for a review,” she said.
She added: “The EC is accountable to us. She has to account to how those errors occurred. When did she discover those errors? What was the process of correcting the errors?”
The Supreme Court had earlier in court told the parties involved in the case that its powers in electoral matters are limited.
To that end, the Court said it cannot compell any witness in the ongoing gearing to mount the witness box to testify.
“We are minded to state that our jurisdiction to invoke this Election Petition is a limited jurisdiction, merely circumscribed by law. We do not intend to extend our mandate as the law report requires of us in such petition before us challenging the validity of the election of a president.
“Simply put, we are not convinced by the invitation being extended to us by Counsel for the petitioner to order the respondent to enter the witness box to be cross-examined. “Accordingly, we hereby overrule the objection moved by Counsel for the petitioner against the decision of the respondents,” the Chief Justice Anin Yeboah said in a ruling on whether or not the Chair of the Electoral Commission (EC) can mount the witness box for cross examination.
Lawyer for the petitioner in the ongoing election petition hearing Tsatsu Tsikata, after the court ruling on Thursday, served notice to re-open his case to enable him subpoena Chair of the Electoral Commission Jean Adukwei Mensa.
Mr Tsikata told the court on Thursday, February 11 that: “We are applying to reopen our case and on that basis we are issuing a subpoena addressed to the Chairperson of the Electoral Commission of Ghana.”
“We also intend to apply for a review of the ruling,” he stated. Hearing has been adjourned to Thursday, February 18.
Source: 3news.com
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority. |
In my view I will advise Mr. Mahama to withdraw his case. They should not blame anybody but themselves in the sense that you go to court on your own strength but not to rely on respondent's cross-examination. What prevent Me Mahama to put figures on the table, that one the respondent have no option but to defend his/her own.
There is an akan proverb that says "Kasa tenten nt) p)nk). To wit "Long talk or speech doesn't buy a horse. There is a difference between lecturing your students in the clasroon and applying the law at the court of law. What Tsatsu should know is that being fluent in the Queens language and using big grammar does not win one a case in the courtroom. Over there, it is law that is applicable. More so, the fact that you have taught them before doesn't make you better than them. Tsatsu! you have disappointed the petitioner, your party and yourself. You see! your long talk and lectures have made look small in the eyes of the Judges