Counsel for Gregory Afoko, Lawyer Nana Yaw Osei has said they will go to court over the new High court ruling that revokes the bail granted to their client who is alleged to have murdered the Upper East Regional Chairman of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), Alhaji Adams Mahama.
According to him, what happened in court on Monday is a shame to the country’s judicial system.
Speaking on Okay FM’s 'Ade Akye Abia' programme, he explained that the ruling came as a surprise to them as their client had been granted bail by a High court, which the police and the Attorney General have failed to comply.
"There is even a contempt case against the Inspector General of Police who has refused to give my client bail, so I am surprised they did not go to court about the contempt case against them."
"However, we will go to a higher court to appeal this case, but this is a clear case of injustice against Mr. Gregory Afoko," he explained.
Background
An Accra High Court presided over by Justice Merley Wood, on Monday, 15 July 2019 quashed the earlier bail granted by another High Court judge, Justice George Buadi in March this year.
Although the suspect met all the bail conditions, the state ignored the court’s ruling and continued to hold the suspect in custody for about three months.
The state, represented by Marina Appiah Opare, on Monday prayed the court to rescind the earlier bail arguing that given the circumstances of the charges and punishment, Mr Afoko, if granted bail, will not appear for the trial.
The court granted the state’s request and reversed the bail, a decision that has sparked public rage with some critics questioning the government’s rule of law credentials.
Watch the interview below
Source: Isaac Kwame Owusu/Peacefmonline.com/[email protected]
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority. |
What is confusing LLB students? Practicing Lawyers are not complaining. The lawyer himself is not confident in what he is saying. Some lawyers are just trying to catch the eyes of the public but they are rather ridiculing themselves. As a lawyer you adduce your arguments in court and not in the Press. Boldly go to the judge and make all your arguments. CHEAP PUBLICITY WILL NOT TAKE YOU FAR.
I HAVE BEEN WAITING TO HEAR THAT THE CHIEF JUSTICE HAS SUSPENDED THIS "BETRAYAL" HIGH COURT JUDGE WHO PERHAPS HAS A HIDDEN AGENDA AGAINST HIS OTHER LEARNERD COLLEAGUE. THE RULING WAS JUST BIZZARE AND IT IS CONFUSING TO SO MANY LLB STUDENTS. THEY ARE ASKING MUCH INTERESTING QUESTIONS IN RELATION TO THE TWO RULINGS. WHO IS RIGHT, THE FIRST RULING OR THE MONDAY JULY 16 RULING?